30 to 150 Credits Per Image is Too Expensive for the Models to Stray from the Prompt This Much
Michael
Seriously, they should be following our prompts to the letter, but instead we waste credits after credits getting results that do not match our prompts or reference images.
I'm not even talking about poorly-written prompts; I'm talking about asking for a blue shirt and the AI thinks "blue" is red, green, yellow, orange, any color except blue and having to submit the same request multiple times for it to connect "blue" with the color blue.
It was one thing when it was one or five credits per image, but these new models are too expensive to be this inaccurate.
I know these are standard prices, and the honor system would be a grossly irresponsible way to redeem credits for bad generations, but is there a way to make the AI adhere more closely to the prompt?
In Legacy there was a slider to govern prompt adherence more strictly with less variety or less strictly with more variety. It's just one more handy tool we are now paying more than 30x to not have.
Michael
We also recently lost the ability to see how the AI enhances the prompt when selected.
This was handy for refining our prompts to prevent misinterpretation.
Not sure why we keep losing features and abilities.